Tip #1: “Stable” Doesn’t Mean “Safe”
The term “stable” is often used in medical records to reassure — but in reality, it’s vague, subjective, and frequently misleading. In trauma, ICU, ER, nursing home, post-op, or sedation cases, to name a few, a patient can be labeled “hemodynamically stable” while actively deteriorating.
What attorneys should know:
- “Stable” only describes current vitals — it says nothing about the overall trajectory or underlying risks. A patient can be “stable” while bleeding internally, hypoxic, or septic. This is due to the body compenating.
- Sedation can mask warning signs — quiet doesn’t always mean better. Monitor trends, not just snapshots.
- Look for hidden instability — clues may appear in nursing notes, respiratory therapy flowsheets, or rapid response activations shortly after a “stable” notation.
- Discharge decisions based on “stability” should be scrutinized — especially if followed by readmission, arrest, or adverse outcome.
Bottom line: Don’t let the word “stable” close the case — it’s often a placeholder, not a full picture.
Tip #2: Be Suspicious of Copy-Paste Charting
📝 Identical notes across multiple shifts?
That’s not efficiency — it’s a warning sign. It often means no one’s reassessing the patient, just copying forward old information.
⚠️ Cloned documentation = compromised care.
In ICU, post-op, or trauma cases, this can mean providers missed changes, ignored trends, or failed to act.
🔍 What to look for:
- Progress notes that are word-for-word the same
- “Stable” status repeated despite abnormal vitals
- Lack of evolving assessment despite clinical changes
- Notes that don’t match the nursing documentation or vitals
- Templates filled out with no patient-specific details
💥 Why it matters in your case:
- Shows failure to monitor or reassess
- Supports claims of negligence or systemic failure
- Undermines the credibility of the medical team
- Suggests lack of individualized care
- Can call into question the authenticity of the medical record
Tip: Compare the notes to vital signs, meds, and nursing documentation. If the chart looks copy-pasted — it probably was.
Tip #3: Don’t Overlook Procedural Sedation Records
😴 Sedation ≠ sleep.
Just because a patient was quiet doesn’t mean they were stable. Sedation requires active monitoring — not passive observation.
📋 Procedural sedation records are often buried.
They’re sometimes tucked into separate sections or scanned PDFs. Missing them means missing critical details about patient safety.
🔍 What to look for:
- Incomplete sedation monitoring forms
- Long gaps between vital sign recordings
- Missing entries of oxygen, blood pressure, or level of consciousness
- No notes on recovery status or adverse reactions
- Medications administered without proper time tracking or follow-up
💥 Why it matters in your case:
- Shows whether the patient was safely monitored during and after sedation
- Can reveal if oversedation led to respiratory distress, aspiration, or delayed recognition of deterioration
- Highlights system failures — like lack of training or protocol violations
- Sedation mismanagement can be directly linked to poor outcomes or even wrongful death
Tip: These records are easy to miss — but they often hold the key to what really happened. Always find and review them closely.
Tip #4: Vital Sign Trends > Individual Values
📉 One bad number? Maybe nothing. A trend? That’s a problem.
A single abnormal BP or heart rate might not raise alarms — but a consistent decline over hours often signals a patient in trouble.
📊 Trends tell the true clinical picture.
Vitals recorded over time can show a slow deterioration that providers failed to recognize or act on.
🔍 What to look for:
- Gradual drops in blood pressure or oxygen saturation
- Escalating heart rate with no intervention
- Rising respiratory rate — a key early warning of distress
- Changes that go unaddressed over multiple entries
- Vitals documented after interventions instead of before
💥 Why it matters in your case:
- Shows missed opportunities to intervene before crisis
- Supports claims of delayed or negligent response
- Can identify failure to follow hospital early warning protocols
- Trend data may contradict “stable” claims in documentation
- Reveals if vitals were documented consistently or retroactively
Tip: Create a visual timeline of vitals alongside notes and medication records. Patterns jump out fast — and juries understand patterns.
💬 Need a second set of eyes on the records?
At TKO Consulting, we specialize in finding the critical details that others miss. If something feels off in the chart — we’ll help you prove it.
👉 Contact TKO Consulting today for focused, expert insight on your next case.
Leave a Reply